1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the petition review and decision;

A. The Plaintiff is an educational foundation that establishes and operates a D University, etc.

An intervenor was newly appointed as an associate professor of the non-retirement Age Department of D University on September 1, 2009, and was appointed as an associate professor of the retirement age group on March 1, 2016, and he/she is a teacher employed as the chief of the garment Industry Department from September 1, 2016 to April 24, 2018.

In 2017, there is a change in the name of the department to the category of industry in the Department of Korean medicine. (hereinafter referred to as the "Department of Korean medicine, regardless of whether the name of the department has been changed or not). (b)

The internal audit committee of the D University confirmed that it was necessary to take measures such as disciplinary action against the relevant professors, as a result of internal audit on the matters such as “the management of school affairs and student guidance of the D University” from December 2017 to April 16, 2018.

C. On April 26, 2018, the president of the Duniversity proposed disciplinary action against the Intervenor to the Plaintiff on April 27, 2018 following deliberation by the Teachers’ Personnel Committee.

On April 29, 2018, the Plaintiff requested the Teachers' Disciplinary Committee to adopt a heavy disciplinary resolution against the Intervenor on May 3, 2018, following a resolution by the board of directors.

On June 16, 2018, the teachers' disciplinary committee decided to dismiss an intervenor pursuant to Article 61(1) of the Private School Act, deeming that the intervenor violated Article 56 (Duty of Fidelity) and Article 63 (Duty of Fidelity Maintenance) of the State Public Officials Act due to grounds for disciplinary action as follows.

Accordingly, on June 29, 2018, the Plaintiff issued a disciplinary measure to dismiss the Intervenor (hereinafter “instant dismissal disposition”).

The grounds for disciplinary action 1: An intervenor who interferes with the duties of an agency lecture established the subjects of the "Korean Uniform Design2" subject of the "Korean Uniform Design2" subject of the first semester in the year of 2016 as the intervenor is in charge, and voluntarily conducted an agency lecture to E, and the second semester in the year of 2016 established the subjects of "Korean Uniform Design2" as the intervenor is in charge, and voluntarily issued an agency lecture to F, and the first semester in the year of 2017.