The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly submitted by the prosecutor as to the gist of the grounds for appeal, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case, i.e., the defendant's injury on the part of the defendant by making the item D several times, and ii) the defendant's act of threatening D does not constitute self-defense. Thus, although the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case,

2. The Defendant is a director of the C&N partnership, and D (the age of 56) is a member of the C&N committee who filed a lawsuit to revoke the authorization of redevelopment project.

At around 08:50 on November 20, 2012, the Defendant, at the office of Seongdong-gu Seouldong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C&A, informed the other members who supported the redevelopment project by the Defendant of contact contact number D, and received the phone calls from D under paragraph (a). On the other hand, the Defendant, who was requested to do so, carried out the tasks of D’s chest and neck several times, and carried out approximately two weeks of medical treatment with the victim’s brue and salkite, etc.

3. The judgment of the court below is based on the following: (i) with respect to whether the defendant was closely involved in D's title on several occasions, (ii) consistent D's police and each statement in the court of the court below is inconsistent with D's statement on the circumstances of the instant case; (iii) the testimony in the court of the court below at the court of the court below that it is hard to keep reliance; (iv) contrary to the judgment of the court below, the defendant's statement is consistent with the police from the police to the court of the court of the court below; and (v) there is conflict between the union and the union, such as filing a lawsuit against D's officers against D's union members, and filing a lawsuit against D's union members.