The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) is that the Defendant did not see the part of the victim who sits in the stoba and s to 5 times or to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s to s

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below: ① D has consistently stated the process of assaulting the Defendant not only from investigative agencies and the court below to the court of the trial; ② D has been diagnosed by cryp salt, etc. on the day of the instant case, immediately before M hospital, for about two weeks of treatment; ③ D appears to have been aware of the first police officer’s crypance from the Defendant at the time of the examination of the suspect, even though it was not affected by the Defendant at the time of the examination of the suspect, it was clearly stated that it was impossible for the Defendant to have been treated at the Ampha hospital (3 pages of the investigation record); ④ On the other hand, when considering the fact that D was able to have been able to sit in the body part of the charge, such as dump and dump, and that it was impossible for the Defendant to have made a statement to the effect that it was inside the body part of the charge, such as dump and dump.