The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. At the time of appeal, the Defendant found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case on the ground that the victim E (hereinafter “victim”) only prevented the victim E from photographing without permission at the association’s office using a camping scam owned by the association, and there was no scambling of the victim, and even if the Defendant’s grandchildren in domestic affairs contacted the victim’s item, they did not have any intention to inflict any injury.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the victim was faced with the victim’s neck in his hand during the process of keeping the victim from the investigative agency to the court below to consistently take cambling the cam.

In full view of the facts stated in the judgment below, including the following facts: (a) the statement made by F by a police officer F who has witnessed the situation at the time also corresponds to the statement made by the victim; and (c) the victim is issued a written diagnosis of the injury, such as dynasium in need of approximately three weeks of treatment at the Jinsan National Assembly members on January 7, 2017, following the day of the instant case, the victim may be recognized as having inflicted an injury on the victim by facing the victim's neck, such as dynasium, and the victim may sufficiently recognize that there was an intentional injury on the part of the victim, such as dynasium, and therefore, the Defendant's misunderstanding of facts is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.