The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is a director of C&A, and D (the age of 56) is a member of the committee of emergency countermeasures against the association that filed a lawsuit to revoke the authorization of redevelopment project.

At around 08:50 on November 20, 2012, the Defendant, at the Seongdong-gu Seoul E and the third floor C&A office, informed the other members who supported the redevelopment project by the Defendant of contact contact contact number D, and provided D with the phone call under paragraph (D). On the ground that he received the phone call under paragraph (a), the Defendant, who was requested to do so, carried the part of D’s chest and neck back by hand, carried the victim with a hand, and caused the injury in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to the Defendant’s breath and human salt.

2. Although the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion D avoided disturbance, such as speaking against the union officers and taking a bath at the association's office office, and the defendant interfered with the business, and the defendant's chest was pushed about D's chest while leaving the office, there was no or less time when the defendant's act was sealed, and there was no injury that D suffered due to the defendant's act, and there is no credibility in the medical examination submitted by the prosecutor.

Furthermore, the defendant's smuggling constitutes self-defense as a defense against interference with D's business.

3. Judgment by issue

A. First, we examine whether the defendant was closely involved in D's timber several times.

1) The main evidence that corresponds to this part of the facts charged lies in D’s statement at the police station and in this court. The main contents of the statement are as follows. A) The Defendant’s statement submitted to the police on the day of the instant case at the price was tightly sealed in three times.

B. On the day of the instant protocol of statement, the Defendant informed the Defendant F of the mobile phone number to the Defendant and threatened the Defendant by telephone, and the person who notified the Defendant of the phone number today requested the Defendant to go to the partnership office by finding out the fact that the Defendant was aware of the fact, and the Defendant requested the Defendant to go to the partnership office, and therefore, the Defendant was satisfying three times the chest while the Defendant was satisfy and sat down the chest.