logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.02.12 2013고단2372
업무상과실치사등
Text

Defendant

A At the time of imprisonment without prison labor for one year, for one year and six months, for each credit cooperative, for one year, for Defendant C, and for Defendant E.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On the premise of the facts and circumstances, Defendant G Co., Ltd. was awarded a contract for the construction of a new building for Kimpo-si, and Defendant H was awarded a subcontract for the type mold, steel bars, and concrete building parts among the above construction works.

Defendant

A is the head of H’s site in charge of the construction work, including the installation of systems operated in the above construction site. Defendant B is the representative of H’s site in charge of the management and supervision of the business affairs of Defendant B. Defendant C is the representative of H’s company in charge of safety and health management at the construction site. Defendant E is the field agent in charge of all business affairs, including safety management at the construction site. Defendant A is the field agent in charge of safety management at the construction site of the above construction site. Defendant D is the head of G’s site in charge of construction work in charge of the construction work, including the system Dong Ri, and Defendant F is the construction supervisor at the construction site of G, a contracting authority in charge of supervision and supervision over the construction site of the above construction site.

Defendant

G Co., Ltd. was awarded a contract for the construction of the above Q building from June 28, 201 in collaboration with East Construction Co., Ltd.

After that, Dong-do Construction Co., Ltd. subcontracted the construction of molds, steel bars, and concrete building parts to the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction.

As the Eastern Construction Co., Ltd. was insolvent and Defendant B could no longer carry out the construction work directly, Defendant G Co., Ltd. demanded that Defendant B enter a new subcontract around September 2012 and Defendant B continued to carry out the construction work after entering Defendant G with Defendant H upon its demand.

arrow