beta
Text
[Defendant A] The defendant is punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B Employees of Limited Company D are the head of the site office in charge of the industrial safety and health affairs of the “the steel reinforced concrete construction work” among the works to improve access roads to North Korea-U.S., Inc., which are contracted out by Limited Company D, and Defendant D is the owner of the said steel reinforced concrete construction work. Defendant C is the employee of the said stock company, and Defendant E is the head of the site office in charge of the industrial safety and health affairs of the “the work to improve access roads to North Korea-U.S.,” which is the employee of the said corporation, and Defendant E is the owner of the said steel reinforced concrete construction work. Defendant E is the owner of the said works for improving the access roads, and Defendant E is the person who has contracted the said steel reinforced concrete construction work at the construction site of the said steel reinforced concrete construction work.
1. On August 30, 2017, Defendant A: (a) around 09:15, around August 30, 2017, at the construction site for the improvement of access roads to the Hean-Gun, the Defendant was engaged in the work of loading steel bars, which are construction materials located on the floor, on the vehicle.
Since steel salving operations using salpers are always at all at the risk of spreading the salpry due to heavy steel bars, the person who moves the steel by using salpers shall not work in cases where there is a danger of spreading in light of the weight of steel, the size of salpers and the shape of the ground in light of the weight of steel, the size of salpers and the shape of the ground, and even in cases of work, there was a duty of care to prevent safety accidents by checking the absence of workers within the radius of the work.
Nevertheless, while the defendant did not take all the above measures and did not transfer the weight of the steel, the defendant had a limited company D employed within the scope of the above work, and caused the victim's head I ( South, 54 years old) to be shocked due to the negligence in the course of the work, which caused the victim to be shocked by the steel in the middle of the above work.