A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 10:00 on January 29, 2017, the Defendant was arrested as a current offender with interference with business, including: (a) the victim already scambling the scam in the “D cafeteria” operated by the victim C in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul; (b) on the same day, the Defendant was arrested as a new offender with interference with business, such as “the scambling the scam with a large voice,” even though he had already taken the scambs in the “D cafeteria”.

[2] On January 29, 2017, at around 13:50, the Defendant: (a) arrested and received an investigation as a current offender with interference with business as above in the “D cafeteria”; and (b) made a 40-minute failure, such as having a large voice as “the male president Nara,” which read “the male president.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

around 10:20 on January 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) expressed in the “D cafeteria” restaurant located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, 2017 (hereinafter “D cafeteria”); (b) without any justifiable reason, expressed to the said C the desire to “the same year”; (c) her husband E who restrains it; (d) her husband E (e.g., “the flasium flasium and head flasium flasium flasium flasium flasium flasium flasium flasium fladsium fladsium fladsium fladsium flaf

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (a wooden telephone statement);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. In light of the background and motive of the crime of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, a person who has no record of crime exceeding the fine, thereby choosing imprisonment with prison labor. However, the sentencing conditions, such as the degree of damage, method and means of the crime, degree of damage, degree and consequence of the crime, and age of the defendant and sexual behavior, etc., are as follows.