Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On August 23, 2018, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by drinking around about one hour and 30 minutes, including, but not limited to, e.g., drinking at the frequency operated by the victim D in Busan, Daegu, Busan, the Defendant: (b) expressed the cafeteria to the cafeteria employees “I am equal to bit bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch,” and (c) returned to the cafeteria; and (d) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force.
2. The Defendant, at the time and place indicated in the preceding paragraph, and at the same time and place, “A person who fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright the victim.”
3. The Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties, as described in paragraphs 1 and 2, went to the current offender as the Busan Coast Guard E District located in Busan Shipping Daegu G, and went to the Busan Coast Guard E District on August 23, 2018, and came to a parking lot on August 23, 2018, and went to the police officer F who belongs to the said patrol team at around 21:10 on the same day.
“Irre the words “Irre, Irre? Irre? Irre? Irre? Irre?? Irre???? Irre?????????????????
"............. the F’s bridge was 3 times and continued to interfere with the police officer’s lawful arrest of flagrant offenders, etc., by assaulting F on one occasion within the said earth.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made to D or F;
1. Application of H’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 136(1) (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), 314(1) (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), 311 (the point of insult) of the Criminal Act, and Articles 136(1) (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), 311 (the point of insulting) of the Criminal Act