Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 27, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the Busan District Court’s Deputy Branch Branch, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 1, 2013, and on August 8, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court, which became final and conclusive on August 17, 2013.

1. On April 2013, 2013, the Defendant forged a private document by using a drid protocol in the column of the location of real estate in the real estate lease contract form, using the drid protocol to indicate “Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C”, “Seo Man,” “Seo Man,” and “D,” in the resident registration number column of the lessor, “E”, in the resident registration number column of the lessee, “F”, in the resident registration number column of the lessee, and the lessee’s name column “G”, and affixed the E seal delivered from H to the name of the E.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On April 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) requested the registration of business at the J certified Tax Accountants Office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government International; (b) delivered a copy of the forged real estate lease contract to an employee under the name-free circumstance, as if it were a document duly formed, as prescribed in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A real estate lease contract;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, search of each case, and application of statutes governing judgment;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.