logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2017.04.26 2016고단808
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months, for 1 year, for Defendant B, for 10 months, for Defendant C, and for Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates the "P A" in the Chungcheongnam-gun ScarO, and Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, Defendant G, Defendant G, Defendant H, Defendant I, Defendant J, Defendant J, and Defendant K are farmers who grow swe in the places of business listed in the list of offenses listed in the annexed crimes.

The Defendants came to know that, if they are selected as a subsidized project operator of a forest product production-based maintenance project (including straw farming facilities) which is the primary refund of forest product production-based development project in 2015 and 2016 under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and the Livestock Industry, the Defendants were able to build a string, which is a string farming facilities, through government subsidies and financial institutions loan. The above string farming facilities subsidy program selects the relevant farmers as a subsidized project operator for the installation of new and security facilities of string farming and farming households, each local government appoints 40% of the total project cost (including 20% loans) and 60% of the subsidized project cost.

Although the Defendants knew that subsidies should be granted to 40% of the total project cost as above, they agreed to receive subsidies by applying the increased amount of the actual project cost as the project cost.

1. Joint crimes committed by Defendant A and Defendant B

A. On April 2015, the Defendants entered into a contract for the construction of Haice, a fish farming facility, in Q of the Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group, and even if the actual expenses incurred in the construction were to be paid to 48,013,200 won, Defendant B transferred KRW 53,670,230 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Management Bank P operated by Defendant A on May 27, 2015, but transferred KRW 53,513,200 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Management Bank P, which was operated by Defendant A, and completed a total of KRW 53,513,200 on May 28, 2015. Defendant A prepared the details of the transaction as if the actual expenses incurred in the construction were to be paid to Defendant B. Defendant A, as if the actual expenses were to be paid to the Corporation, and prepared the transaction statement and tax account statement and tax account statement and tax account statement as follows.

Defendant B continues to exist on June 8, 2015.

arrow