Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who runs a place of business for growing mushroom in the Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group B with approximately KRW 7,00 square meters in size of approximately 7,00 square meters in his/her consent.

In order to be selected as a subsidy program operator, any person shall have the ability to bear the portion exceeding the subsidies (hereinafter referred to as "self-payment") out of the total construction cost, and in order for a subsidy program operator to actually receive subsidies, he/she shall submit evidentiary documents, such as tax invoice, etc. after conducting construction before receiving the subsidies.

A subsidy related to sweak farming facilities is a project to support new and complementary facilities for growing forest mushrooms, and the budget group received a subsidy application from business operators around February 2, 2013, which is the preceding year of the project, and around March 2014, the Defendant was selected as a business entity. A total of KRW 7,000,000 (the bill of indictment of KRW 3,500,000,000,000, which is written at KRW 350,000,000, under the condition that the Defendant uses KRW 16,942,000,000 in total project expenses, and there is no clear error that it is a clerical error of KRW 3,50,000 and there is no impediment to the Defendant’s exercise of his right to defense.

The decision was made to support the Do subsidy of KRW 70,000, military subsidy of KRW 280,000.

However, as the details of the use of the subsidy for the above project cost before the claim for the subsidy are insufficient, the defendant did not know the details of payment of labor cost, etc. and attempted to obtain the subsidy by preparing a false statement of payment of labor cost and submitting it as documentary evidence.

On December 9, 2014, the Defendant deposited KRW 5,100,000 in the account of the above C, etc. even though four community residents, such as C, etc. did not work, and filed a claim for subsidies by submitting the statement of cash transactions and the statement of payment of personnel expenses as evidentiary data on the settlement of project expenses.

In this respect, the defendant deceivings the victim.