logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.02.22 2017고단4076
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 18, 201, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Ulsan District Court on May 18, 201, a summary order of KRW 4 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, on October 14, 201, a summary order of KRW 4 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving), and on May 14, 201, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 7 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving in drinking), and on December 17, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 6 months for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving in drinking) at the same court.

[2017 Highest 4076]

1. On October 30, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving a CSp-type car without the driver’s license from a section of about 2 km from the front of a wooden wedding place located in the Nam-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-dong to the front of the road at the same time.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation shall operate an automobile which has not been covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated a car in C SP which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.

[2017 Highest 4484]

1. On December 3, 2017, the Defendant, one of the agricultural cooperatives located in the Yancheon-dong, Seocheon-gu, Ulsan-do, Seoul, under the influence of alcohol by 0.189% in alcohol while under the influence of alcohol during blood without obtaining a driver’s license from approximately 100 meters in the section of approximately 100 meters from the runway to the yellow-gu in the same Gu.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act: (a) operated a passenger car on the designated date and at the place specified in paragraph (1) that did not purchase mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

[Prior Records] 2017 Highest 4484 Highest 2017 highest 12 highest 2017 highest 4076 highest 4076

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Motor vehicle driver's license ledger and mandatory insurance inquiry (2017 high group 4484);

1. The defendant's statement in court;

arrow