logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.06.21 2018고정377
자동차손해배상보장법위반
Text

The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On August 9, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of road traffic law (drinking driving) at the Daejeon District Court on November 3, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 3, 2017.

[Criminal facts] The owner of an automobile shall not operate an automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance.

Nevertheless, on April 15, 2013, the Defendant driven a B SP vehicle owned by the Defendant, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the Jinsan-gun, Jinsan-gun, Jinsan-gun, Jinsan-gun, Jinsan-gun, Jinsan-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiry into the motor vehicle registration ledger, the history of medical insurance contracts, and inquiry into non-insurance operation vehicles;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Inquiry about criminal history, Daejeon District Court 2017No. 2509, Supreme Court 2017No. 2509, and application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on search of net cases;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 46 (2) 2 and 8 of the Guarantee of Compensation for Damages of Motor Vehicles that choose a penalty, and selection of a fine;

1. Subsequent to Article 37 of the Criminal Act: Provided, That Article 39 (1) of the same Act shall apply to concurrent crimes and exemption from punishment (the confession, reflectivity, payment of insurance premiums, violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation in this case, and the case of concurrent judgment of a violation of Road Traffic Act for which a ten-month judgment of imprisonment has already become final and conclusive at the same time);

arrow