Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2017 Highest 2411"
1. On June 27, 2008, the Defendant is a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on two or more occasions by being sentenced to a summary order of KRW 700,000,000 to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving of alcohol) at a flood control center on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On August 12, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving of Drinking) at a flood control center.
On February 6, 2017, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle in the E Spo area while under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.167% among five meters alcohol alcohol at the front of the D convenience store located in Kpo-si C around the Gpo-si.
2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages is a person holding a car in the E-Spo-type.
On February 6, 2017, the Defendant moved the said car to the front of the D convenience store located in Suwon-si C, and operated a car not covered by mandatory insurance by moving the said car at a quantity of 5 meters.
On August 5, 2017, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle in the E Sp-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-
Summary of Evidence
"2017 Highest 2411"
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;
1. A written statement;
1. On-site photographs;
1. Investigation report (verification as to whether a suspect drives alcohol, damage to a vehicle, etc.), and a written reply to inquiry about the fact;
1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;
1. An inquiry into the enemy and mandatory insurance;
1. The records of the judgment: In the investigation report (Attachment of the judgment of the defendant in question), inquiry results [Judgment as to the defendant's assertion], Defendant 1 left a store in order to move a vehicle that he did not walked at the time, and the defendant 1 left the vehicle in the future, and the defendant 1 left the vehicle in the future, and the defendant 2 took hand outside the defendant 1 where he did not walk.