logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2017.12.21 2017고단419
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 419"

1. On July 13, 2017, the Defendant driven the E-to-be under the influence of alcohol content of 0.108% while under the influence of alcohol without a motor device bicycle license, on the front side of the D in the racing-si, 19:17, around July 13, 2017.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, operated e-mail, which was not covered by mandatory insurance.

On July 25, 2017, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3 million on July 25, 2017, for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) at the Daegu District Court racing support, and on July 28, 2017, the Defendant was not detained due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) and was charged for the same kind of criminal records other than those currently pending in the trial.

1. On September 28, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with 0.073% alcohol concentration in blood without obtaining a bicycle license from the Defendant’s house located in the racing-si on September 15:10, 2017 to the front road of the race-si LPG charging station in the racing-si, the Defendant driven the E 110cc under the influence of alcohol level 0.073% while under the influence of alcohol in blood.

As a result, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition on drinking under the Road Traffic Act two or more times, once again driven a motor bicycle without obtaining a bicycle license under the influence of alcohol in violation of the prohibition on driving under the influence of alcohol.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a holder of an objection to E 110cc under paragraph (1).

No person shall operate any motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance on a road.

The Defendant operated the above Oral Ba, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The defendant;

arrow