A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who was in a de facto marital relationship between B and B from September 2012 to September 2016.

Around January 6, 2018, the Defendant: (a) filed an application for provisional attachment with the Jungyang Branch of the District Court on August 6, 2015; (b) filed an application with the same court for payment order on the same date; (c) filed it with the same court as a document duly formed; and (b) filed it with the said court on the same date; (b) filed it with the Defendant for the purpose of having the said B obtain criminal punishment; (d) by forging a letter of delegation, agent:B; and terms of delegation: (B); (d) forged a letter of delegation with the effect that “B” was a false and forged; and (e) submitted a false letter of delegation with the effect that “A” was the delegation order; and (e) submitted it to the said district court on February 26, 2016 for payment of the deposit money; and (e) made it possible for the said district court to present the said district court’s order on February 15, 2016 to the effect that the said letter of delegation was issued.

However, in fact, B did not have arbitrarily prepared the loan certificate under the name of the defendant, and around February 26, 2016, B did not use the loan certificate and the proxy certificate as it was obtained from the defendant and prepared a proxy certificate, and B did not use the loan certificate and the proxy certificate accordingly. B applied for the payment order based on the loan certificate lawfully prepared, and B received the bond seizure and collection order based on the name of the debtor as the title of the debt, and therefore, B did not belong to the court by submitting false evidence.

Nevertheless, on January 15, 2018, the defendant filed a complaint with the police officer whose name cannot be known at the public service center of the Pakistan Police Station, which was 140 in the 쇠 Jae-ro, in the event of the game strike.