logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.02.15 2017고단50
무고
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around July 15, 1995, the Defendant: (a) at the D Production Center located in the Jeonsan District Court, the Defendant’s husband E as a joint guarantor; and (b) prepared one copy of the loan certificate equivalent to KRW 20 million with the Defendant’s husband E; and (c) on February 10, 2000, the Defendant participated in a civil lawsuit against the Defendant based on the above loan certificate; (d) on January 19, 201, the Jeonju District Court’s 99 Military Accounting Branch 1040, the Defendant won the loan lawsuit against the Defendant; and (e) on January 19, 2010, the Seoul District Court issued a payment order for the said loan to the Defendant and E, and (e) on January 19, 2010, the Jeonju District Court issued a ruling to the effect that the loan was paid to the Defendant and E, and (e) on January 27, 2010, the Jeonju District Court under the objection against the above payment order.

F On May 26, 2015, the around the Jeonju District Court rendered a decision to commence an auction of real estate, such as Y, the Y owned by the said decision, and the enforcement procedure was initiated by F. F. In determining that F does not keep the original copy of the loan, the Defendant was unaware of his intention to file a complaint with the purport that F would have forged the loan certificate and received a favorable judgment in the loan lawsuit.

On August 16, 2016, the Defendant drafted a written complaint stating that “F would have obtained a favorable judgment in a loan lawsuit by deceiving the court in spite of the fact that it had not received a loan certificate equivalent to KRW 70 million from the Defendant,” by means of forging the loan certificate, and thus would be punished for fraud.”

However, in fact, F did not have submitted it to the court by forging the above loan certificate.

Nevertheless, on August 17, 2016, the defendant submitted a written complaint to the person in charge of the civil petition room at the Dosan Police Station around 10:00.

arrow