logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.11.12 2015고단2457
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 14:15 on April 21, 2015, the Defendant entered the D convalescent Hospital located in C, with the nameless nurse, who is under duty, called “the Military Service System”, and talks that the nurse “the patient of the above hospital gets to drink” to “the patient of the above hospital see whether the patient was drinking or not, me to see whether there is a drinking beverage,” me to see, and see, “the patient of the above hospital is not in any way to go to the hospital,” and me to see, “the patient of the above hospital is not in any way to go to the hospital,” and me to see, “the patient of the above hospital and the patient of the above hospital are not in any way to go to the hospital,” and me to see, at around 16:20 on the same day, the Defendant reported 112 report by the victim F, a general director of the above hospital.

(h) It is not required to have only a certain area of passage to posts;

The management of the victim's hospital was interfered with by force by engaging in a disturbance between about 20 minutes, such as passing sound.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on report of occurrence;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts, and the selection of fines (see: e.g., reasons for sentencing)

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant has repeatedly been subject to disturbance at the time of the withdrawal of alcohol, and as long as long as the defendant has been released from other crimes, the crime of this case is committed, and there is a need for any corresponding strict punishment.

However, in consideration of the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized and divided, that the defendant lives in an economically weak life as a beneficiary under the National Basic Living Security Act, and that the victim of obstruction of business, etc. want not to be punished against the defendant but wanted to be punished, the punishment shall be determined by a fine as above.

arrow