A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 12, 2019, the Defendant obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) around 13:40 on November 12, 2019, the head of the Jeju Provincial Office for Civil Petitions D (W, 42 years old) belonging to the Jeju Provincial Office for Civil Petition Management (hereinafter referred to as “D”) to inform the Defendant of his/her present domicile; (b) he/she heard the answer that he/she cannot inform the Defendant of his/her address when he/she is not his/her lineal ascendant or descendant. (c) 100,000 won will not be left from other Dongs. (d) 10,000 won will be left. (c) It means that the head of the Jeju Provincial Office for Civil Petition Management (hereinafter referred to as “D”) will go against D, thereby interfering with the legitimate execution of official duties.

2. Interference with business;

A. At around 16:00 on November 18, 2019, the Defendant: (a) committed a disturbance, such as following the Defendant: (a) on the ground that the Victim F (36 years of age) operated by the said Victim F (hereinafter referred to as “F”) in Jeju-si, Jeju-si, for the reason that the said Victim was not equipped with the desired goods of the Defendant; (b) and (c) the said Victim, with a knife with a knife, knife, knife, and knife, with a knife, and thus, obstructed the operation of the said Victim’s Seodaemun points by force.

B. On November 24, 2019, the Defendant was above the Defendant around 15:37.

At the place indicated in the port, the victim F (the 36-year-old person did not speak that he would die with a knife. B). Although the victim returned the Defendant, the victim would return the Defendant at around 17:53 of the same day, and the victim would return it again to the said victim “I would report it to the said victim as a crime of false mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad.” The victim interfered with the operation of the above victim’s shop by force by avoiding the disturbance, such as hicking the voice “Irick.” at the crosswalk of the entrance of the said

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant in this court;

1. The defendant of the police preparation.