1. The defendant and each of the non-party Chinese Commercial Damage Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "non-party Chinese Commercial Damage Insurance Co., Ltd.") shall be the plaintiff 57,219,567 and

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1) The Plaintiff is the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”).

(2) A special corporation established by the Minister of Employment and Labor and entrusted with the industrial accident compensation insurance business, which is a corporation with a capacity to carry out the industrial accident compensation insurance business.

A) A (hereinafter referred to as “the insured”) is in the relationship between the insurer and the insured under the Industrial Accident Compensation Act.

(2) The Defendant Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. is an insurer that entered into an automobile insurance contract with the owner C to compensate for damages incurred in relation to the operation of Defendant 1’s vehicle.

The non-party Han Liber Insurance Co., Ltd. was the first defendant in this case, but it became final and conclusive because it did not raise any objection against the decision of recommending reconciliation.

The owner E is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract in order to secure damages arising in connection with the operation of Defendant 2.

B. Around 12:59 on July 3, 2010, Defendant 2, a driver of the instant traffic accident, was driving at a speed of about 50 to 60km in the direction of the Incheon Airport, along with two lanes near the Incheon Airport from the west of the Incheon Bridge, while the vehicle of Defendant 2, a driver of the instant vehicle stopped at a point 2.2 km in the direction of the Incheon Airport at the speed of about 13:15 on the same day, as the engine cannot be known at a point 2.2km in the direction of the Incheon Airport and stopped at the speed of about 70 to 80km in the direction of the vehicle of Defendant 2 along the above YoungIC on the two-lane. The vehicle of Defendant 1, a driver of the instant vehicle of Defendant 2, a driver of the instant case, was driving at a speed of about 70 to 15 meters in the speed of speed in the direction of Defendant 2 along the two-lane road. The vehicle of Defendant 1, a speed of Nonparty 2 (hereinafter “Defendant 1”).