logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.03 2016가단5107441
구상금
Text

1. The Plaintiff, the Federation of the Passenger Transport Business Association of Korea, and the Defendant Company.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The parties concerned are the insurers who have entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to ABE vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant National taxi transport business association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) is a mutual aid business entity who has entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to B rocketing taxi (hereinafter “Defendant 1”), and the Defendant K non-life insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant K non-life insurance”) is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to C rocketing and other vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant 2”).

B. At around 04:45 on March 16, 2013, D, while driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle and driving it in the Jungdong-gu, Daegu Metropolitan City at a speed of about 80km in the speed of Si/Gun/Gu depending on the three-lane road from the middle intersection of Jungdong-dong to the yellow four-lane, D had the victim E’s right-hand bridge side of the above vehicle, which opened the crosswalk on the right-hand side from the right-hand side of the above vehicle, go over to the upper right-hand side of the above vehicle, with the direction-hand part front of the above vehicle’s right-hand side, the right-hand side part, the right-hand side part, and the right-hand side part (hereinafter “first accident”).

) In the meantime, Defendant 1’s vehicle driving the same three lanes at a speed of about 80 km per hour had been used on the surface of the front road (hereinafter “the second accident”).

) Following the two-lanes of the same road, Defendant 2 of G Driving, who had been straighted at a speed of about 65 km in speed, followed by the two-lanes of the same road, was driving the said Party E again (hereinafter referred to as “third-lane accident”).

). 2) 이 사건 1차 사고 지점에는 횡단보도가 설치되어 있었으나 피해자 E은 신호를 위반하여 횡단보도를 횡단하다가 원고차량과 부딪혀 약 6~7m 정도 튕겨나가 횡단보도 끝부분 쯤에 넘어져 웅크리고 있었는데 그러한 피해자를 미처 발견하지 못한 피고1 차량이 앞범퍼로 피해자를 충격하여 끌고 진행하며 우측 후륜으로 역과하였고, 이어 피고2 차량이...

arrow