Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 28, 2013, at around 08:50, the Defendants: (a) ordered the victim E, an employee, to add the tenant to the “D” restaurant located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City; and (b) Defendant B rejected the victim’s drinking as only drinking and refused to do so; (c) thereby, Defendant B expressed the victim’s key to “where the customer asks for drinking, she should be given, and she should be given.” In doing so, Defendant B expressed the victim’s desire to “I will be dead. I will do so,” and Defendant A expressed the victim’s desire to “I will be aware of the same year, hick, and hick from the old, and will be unable to enter the restaurant and enter the restaurant by avoiding the disturbance over about 25 minutes.”

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. 공무집행방해 피고인들은 2013. 9. 28. 09:15경 위 식당에서 112신고를 받고 출동한 서울관악경찰서 F지구대 소속 경찰공무원 G 등이 식당에서 행패를 부리는 피고인들을 제지하려 하자, 피고인 B은 위 G에게 "너희 뭐야 이 씨발 놈들아”라고 욕설을 하면서 주먹으로 위 G의 빰을 1회 때리고 발로 위 G의 허벅지를 1회 걷어차고, 피고인 A은 발로 위 G의 허벅지를 1회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning G crime prevention and control, which is a police official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to G and E;

1. Relevant Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act; Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act; Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act; and the choice of fines for the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes (defendants), the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above;