logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.03.28 2013고정3
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 14, 2012, at around 01:00, the Defendant interfered with his duties: (a) around 01:00, the Defendant: (b) took the drinking together with friendly C in the Gangnam-gu B cafeteria; (c) took a talk with C while drinking alcohol; (d) took a lot of talks with C; (e) took the table by cutting off C; and (e) took the table by cutting off the table to the other customers who had the table on the instant cafeteria; and (e) took the public bath, the Defendant interfered with the duties concerning the operation of the cafeteria, which is an employee of the said cafeteria, of the said cafeteria for about two hours.

2. 공무집행방해 피고인은 2012. 10. 14. 05:55경 서울 강남구 대치동 998 강남경찰서 형사과 사무실에서 제1항과 같이 소란을 부리다 현행범 체포되어 조사를 받던 중 일어서서 “날 신고한 사람을 데려와라”라고 소리치다가 강남경찰서 소속 경사 E이 피고인에게 자리에 앉으라고 했다는 이유로 발로 E의 낭심 부위를 1회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the investigation of the case E, a police officer, and the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order in the police station.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each written statement prepared D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of violence victim photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

arrow