Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On October 13, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year by imprisonment with prison labor for an injury, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court, and the judgment was finalized on February 20, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The accused of forging a private document or uttering a falsified private document shall have his resident registration certificate of the victim B living together with his mind to open and use a mobile phone in the name of the victim;

On January 31, 2017, the Defendant entered “B”, “F”, and “G” in the name column of the E Service Subscription Form located near the D Hospital located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, in the name column of the E Service Subscription Form, and entered “B” in the customer column, entered the victim’s signature in that column, entered “B” in the name column of the E Service Subscription Form, and continued to be kept in that space as “B” and “F” and “H” in the name column of the E Service Subscription Form, entered the victim’s signature in the “B” and “F” and “H” in the date of birth column, written the victim’s signature in the “B” column, and submitted the victim’s signature in that side to the customer column as if it were duly formed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the two copies of the application for the E-service subscription in the name of the victim, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, and used the forged private document.

2. The Defendant submitted two copies of the application for service subscription, which is a forged private document, at the same time and place as that of paragraph 1, to the victim dispute resolution E through the staff in charge of the name in error.

However, even if the defendant subscribed to the victim company, he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay the mobile phone price, and even if the application for subscription to the mobile phone in B submitted to the victim company was forged, he/she deceiving the above employee in charge as if the above documents were prepared normally.