(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.07.01 2016고정651

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.07.01 2016고정651

특수협박

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On March 4, 2016, the Defendant driven a NAS car (C) around 15:00, while driving the NAS car at around 15:00, the Defendant threatened the FF with a string in the direction of the hospital located in Gwangjunam-gu, using a dangerous object, by driving the vehicle, by driving the 3-laned vehicle on the road in front of the shooting distance of the hospital E in Gwangju-gu, into the free advertising market. On the other hand, the Defendant left in the future of the FF driver's string of the two lanes or by driving the FF in a two-lane manner. However, the Defendant threatened the FF by driving the NAS car in a two-lane way to change its course into the NAS car, thereby interfering with the FF course.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence adopted and examined by this court, the following cases were developed.

1) On March 4, 2016, F driving a rocketing car at around 15:07, and driving the rocketing car at around 15:07, a two-lane, a straight line, from among the three-lane roads in front of the shooting distance of the E hospital located in Gwangju Southern-gu, is moving directly to the maid market from the port side of the day hospital. The Defendant, while driving a NAS car, was driving the same three-lane of the same road in the same direction as behind the right side of the rocketing or other automobiles.

2) The F and the Defendant are straight lines in front of the two straight lines, and the three-lanes in the direction of the operation are the lanes prior to the right-hand (in the intersection, the road is reduced to the two-lanes). The Defendant, after passing the F in order to a direct progress, kid the road in front of the other car at the intersection, followed by the immediately behind the other car at the speed of F, string the wind and following the end of the car at the speed.

3) The Defendant changed the course to a one-lane along the intersection, and changed the course to a two-lane, where the two-lanes are going straight (the road re-scheduled to a third-lane), and the F was going to go ahead by a speed.

4) F is moving three lanes by turning the Defendant into a two-lane, turning on mar, emergency, etc., raising a rapid speed.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2018.02.08 2016고단5100

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.19 2018고단1312

-대전지방법원 공주지원 2017.10.13 2017고정74

-부산지방법원 2018.06.07 2018고단1151

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.06.15 2018고단332