A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months and by a fine not exceeding five hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the performance of official duties, around Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si; (b) assaulted the victim’s left knife at the back seat of the 112 patrol police station in Gyeonggi Kimpo-si, who was reported and called 112 at the time of the occurrence of the 112 Sin-si (50 years old); (c) in order to ask the circumstances of the instant case, the Defendant: (d) expressed the victim’s desire to “Sero gue”; (d) kid the victim’s flab with flab; and (e) continuously flad the victim’s flab with drinking flab; and (e) flad the victim’s knife with drinking flae at the back seat

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate performance of official duties.

2. The Defendant was arrested in the act of committing a crime on September 3, 2017 from around 22:15 to around 23:15, on the same ground as the statement in paragraph (1), and was under the influence of alcohol to the police officers after arriving in both villages of the Kimpo Police Station, and after having arrived at the police station in both villages of the Kimpo Police Station, “this rings, widths,” and so on.

They are off of clothes.

The bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a police box.

Accordingly, the Defendant, while drunk, dumped and imprisoned by the government offices.

[Defendant and defense counsel asserts that no act was committed as stated in the judgment with regard to a crime that interferes with official duties.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the police officer committed the act of assaulting the police officer as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the defendant.

I seem to appear.

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion is without merit.

① A victimized police officer or witness appeared as a witness in this court and took an oath, and made a detailed statement about the actions of the defendant at the time and the details of assault by the victimized police officer.

The contents are consistent with each of the statements and main contents in the investigative agency.

There is no contradiction between each statement and the court's attitude to make a statement.