logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.11.10 2017고단2141
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding three hundred thousand won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 12, 2017, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) around 00:45, on the grounds that he was under the influence of a police box at the Gyeonggi Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si, and (b) on the grounds that he received an unreasonable high-quality demand from a taxi engineer, and (c) on the ground that he received a direction from the police officer, that “The vice charge shall be reported to the competent viewing department.” However, the police officer was directed “I am to the police officer, who was subject to the control of the competent viewing department; (b) whether I am to the

Dap fran k kb whether the dissatisfaction of Na is not resolved or not.

The Doctrine was expressed in a large scale, such as “the reported year, flaz,” “the head of the flaz.”

Accordingly, the defendant was unable to avoid disturbance while being drunkd by government offices for about 30 minutes.

2. On September 12, 2017, the Defendant was arrested in the act of committing a crime on the grounds that he was unable to escape a disturbance as set forth in paragraph 1 at the C police box, around 02:15, at around September 12, 2017, at around 02:15, and thereafter, the police officer was arrested in the act of committing a crime as set forth in paragraph 1. On the other hand, in order for the police officers to hand over the Defendant’s new disease to the criminal team of the Kimpo Police Station, the instant C police box to the chief of the police box affiliated with the above C police box: “T

“The position of “” and the position of his head shall be drawn up on his hand.

As a result, the defendant assaulted the above police officer D and interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning 112 report processing and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A criminal investigation report (a identification card, a work log, a diagnostic report, a CCTV screen), a criminal investigation report (CCTV video and a caps screen), a criminal investigation report (CCTV video verification), a internal investigation report, and a arrest report on the occurrence of the case;

1. An identification card and a place of service;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph the skin's photograph, CCTV images, and to photograph theme;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of official duties, choice of imprisonment), Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of disturbance of official duties, selection of fines) concerning criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and Article 38 (1) 3 of the same Act concerning the aggravation of concurrent crimes;

1. The Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

arrow