logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.02.03 2014고단2220
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than six months and a fine not exceeding 300,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 15, 2014, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in the D District parking lot located in the Gu District on the 20:30 on May 15, 2014, and the E officer belonging to the Gu Police Station D branch of the Gu Police Station that observed the Defendant, the Defendant was the Defendant, and the E officer of the Gu Police Station D branch of the Gu Police Station who was affiliated with the D branch of the Gu Police Station who was affiliated with the D branch of the Gu Police Station. The Defendant “Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

“In doing a bath, the part of the title of E in his hand was blicked once, and the part of the body part of E in his drinking was assaulted once by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crimes and the control of crimes by police officers.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, was arrested in the act of committing an act of committing an act of interference with the performance of official duties at the police station D, and was under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance for about 40 minutes for the police officers who were under the influence of alcohol, following the Defendant’s talking that “a police officer who was arrested in the act of committing an act of interference with the performance of official duties at the police station D.”

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, led to a very rough speech and behavior in a public office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statement of witness E in the second public trial protocol;

1. The application of the law to G’s statement by the police [the above facts charged are acknowledged according to the above evidence, and the CCTV in the D District does not vary solely on the ground that the CCTV was not kept in the D District];

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the relevant Act on the facts constituting an offense, and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act;

1. Election of imprisonment with prison labor and fines for violating the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, which interferes with selective execution of official duties;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes;

arrow