beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2014 Highest 4965"
1. On April 8, 2014, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that he would sell 91,50 won if he remitted 91,50 won to the victim E, by accessing the Defendant’s house located in the Busan Northern-gu, Busan, to the NAV website, and by visiting the NAV website, and reporting it.
However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the contact diskettes to the victim.
Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 91,500 from the victim to the new bank account (F) under the name of the Defendant as the price for the goods, and acquired KRW 9,610,200 in total from 45 to May 24, 2014, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.
"2014 Highest 7805"
2. On June 17, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would sell 40,000 won to the Defendant’s bank account (H) and send it to the Defendant immediately after the deposit confirmation,” by using the computer at the Defendant’s home located in Busan Northern-gu, and by using the Defendant’s home, “The Defendant would seek the right to freedom of Ireland” posted by the Victim G.
However, since the defendant did not have the above right to freedom at the time, there was no intention or ability to send the above right to freedom even if he receives the payment from the victim.
The Defendant received 40,000 won from the victim to the national bank account in the name of the said Defendant under the pretext of the price for the right to freedom of day.
In addition, between the Defendant and August 20, 2014, the Defendant’s “BE” No. 14 as of the date of the commission of the crime No. 14 attached to the attached Table 2 of the List of Crimes (Evidence No. 159, Jul. 12, 2014) is a clerical error (Evidence No. 246, Jun. 24, 2014), and the “AF” No. 15 is a clerical error (Evidence Record No. 159) of the “AF.”