logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2014.06.09 2013고단589
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, who was in de facto marital relationship with the victim B, was unable to buy a motor vehicle to the defendant C and D by using the name of the defendant due to credit or other problems, and the defendant stolen the victim's seal imprint, etc., and used the victim's name to misappropriation, etc., and thought that the motor vehicle was dead.

1. At around 12:00 on May 4, 2012, the Defendant: (a) stolen the Defendant’s house located in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do; (b) used the victim’s name to obtain vehicles from the Defendant’s son, etc. using the victim’s name; and (c) used one copy of the Defendant’s resident registration certificate and one copy of the Plaintiff’s seal impression owned by the victim who was in the inner bladul, during the period of the victim’s car death.

2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. A. On May 4, 2012, the Defendant forged a private document on the certificate of the personal seal impression and forged a letter of delegation issued in the name of B, a private document on the rights and duties for the purpose of exercising the certificate of the personal seal impression affixed to B with the certificate of the personal seal impression affixed on the certificate of the personal seal impression affixed to the delegating column by using the resident registration certificate and the certificate of the personal seal impression issued by B, which was stolen as described in paragraph (1), and used the certificate of the personal seal impression issued by B without obtaining the consent or delegation from B on or around May 4, 2012, the Defendant used it as if he had been duly formed with the employees G of the above community service center, who was aware of the forgery.

B. On May 4, 2012, the Defendant, at the office of the Defendant’s “I” in the Gyeonggi-si H around May 4, 2012, was delegated by B with respect to the purchase of automobiles and the payment of the purchase price of automobiles, regardless of the fact that he/she had forged private documents on the documents related to the purchase of automobiles and the payment of the purchase price of automobiles.

arrow