beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is the actual operator of Eul-si Co., Ltd. D, which is the victim Young-gu Co., Ltd., and the victim Young-gu Co., Ltd. supplied products such as pesticide products to the above D in Gwangju City, which was a corporation operating wholesale and retail business of agrochemicals, etc. in Gwangju City, and accumulated, such as around KRW 300,000,000,000, which was not paid to the victim in July 2012, the victim demanded additional security, such as surety, from the victim side.
When the Defendant received a demand for payment from the victim as above and received a demand for additional security, he thought that he would offer additional security to the victim by stealing the name of E by using the Defendant’s attached seal.
1. Forgery of private documents, and fabrication of securities;
A. On July 31, 2012, the Defendant forged private document: (a) on March 26, 2012, on the part of the foregoing D office using a color pen, entered the name “F in Gyeonggi-si”, “G” and “E” in the resident number column in the column of joint and several surety address under the product sales contract for the victim and D Co., Ltd. on March 26, 2012; and (b) affixed the seal imprint of E, which had been placed in advance following the name.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a sales contract for goods in the name of E, a private document on rights and duties.
B. The Defendant: (a) stated, at the time, at the time, place specified in the foregoing paragraph (a); (b) the bill number I issued by H’s representative director H using the scriptive pension; and (c) the face value and the due date of the issuance date of a promissory note in the blank column of “E located in the Gyeonggi-do EF on July 31, 2012; and (d) affixed the E’s seal impression in advance following the name.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged endorsement in the name of E, which is a description of the rights and obligations of promissory notes, which are securities.
2. Uttering of the current investigation document, counterfeited securities; and