(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.21 2015나61834

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.21 2015나61834

손해배상(기)

Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 5,000,000 and shall also be paid to the plaintiff on December 2010.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "the end of July 9, 2010" in Part 2, Part 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance; "the end of July 9, 2010"; "the speed of detention" in Part 3 and Part 4 "the continuous management" in Part 8 of the same part shall be used as "the continuous indictment"; "the continuous management" shall be deleted; No. 9; No. 14 shall be deleted; "the scope of damages" in Part 15 shall be added to "the final decision"; "10 million won" in Part 17 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "5 million won"; "the final decision of the court of first instance shall be accepted by the court of first instance by 2015, Dec. 26, 2015," and "the final decision of the court of first instance shall be accepted by the court of first instance by 200,000 won" in part 17.

[Supplementary Contents] The scope of compensation for damages was damaged by the article of this case, and it is obvious in light of the empirical rule that the plaintiff suffered from mental pain. As such, the defendant is obligated to pay consolation money to the plaintiff. In full view of the plaintiff's age and social status, occupation, background leading up to the defendant's report of the article of this case, the form and content of the article of this case, and all other circumstances shown in the argument of this case, the amount of consolation money that the defendant is liable to compensate is more than five million won.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed as without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is partially different from this conclusion, the defendant's appeal is partially accepted and the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as per Disposition.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2015.09.25 2015나3545

-대구지방법원 2015.04.23 2014나19637

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.30 2015나14371

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.06 2015나72834

-서울고등법원 (춘천) 2018.05.02 2018나300