1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

Defendant 1,481,355,760 won and its 1,440,122.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: ① the calculation table of damages in attached Form 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be replaced: ② the date of closing the argument in this case from Part 4 to Part 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as the date of closing the argument in the court of first instance; ② the date of closing the argument in this case from Part 17 to Part 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as the date of closing the argument in the court of first instance; ② the date of closing the argument in this case from Part 19 and Part 5 to Part 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as the “date of closing the argument in the court of first instance from Part 15 to 16 of the judgment, which is the date following the date of closing the argument in this case,” respectively, and ③ the supplementary statement of the first instance court of first instance shall be deemed as the “date of closing the argument in the court of first instance, which shall be deemed as the supplementary statement of the first instance and the remaining part 6th of the judgment.

2. (1) The calculation table of future treatment costs, aids, and nursing costs (1) the new treatment costs (1) the new treatment costs of which are 1) the urcology of urcology (1) the urcology of urcology (2) the urcology of the urcium (3 urcium costs);

3. In conclusion, the Defendant’s damages for delay calculated at the rate of KRW 1,481,35,760 as well as KRW 1,440,122,318 cited by the court of first instance among the Plaintiff and KRW 1,440,122,318, which is the date of the instant accident, until November 24, 2015, which is deemed reasonable for the Defendant to dispute over the existence and scope of the obligation.