1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendants jointly do so to the plaintiff 114,279,547 won and this.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "Nos. 1 through 10" in Part 7 of Part 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance; "Nos. 1 through 4" in Part 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance; "each description" in part 8 of the same part shall be deemed as "each description and image"; "No. 50% of H and the defendant's negligence ratio" in Part 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be 4:6; "No. 15,232,956 won (less than won) equivalent to 50% of the defendant Gap's apportionment ratio" in Part 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be "no. 114,279,547 won (per 60% of the defendant's apportionment ratio ? 190, 465, 910, 6.13.6.)"; "No. 251, 2501, 2947.2.2" shall be deemed to be deemed to be "No 94.20.1.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants of this case is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as there is no ground. The judgment of the court of first instance is unfair in some different conclusions, and the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as per Disposition.