1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded and reduced in the trial, shall be modified as follows.

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation as to the instant case is written as stated in paragraph (2). Paragraph (3) is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except where a judgment on the Plaintiff’s assertion made in the trial is added. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be dried;

A. On the 2nd page of the first instance judgment, the “paragraph 6” in the 14th sentence is regarded as “paragraph 6.”

B. On the second page of the first instance judgment, “from July 30, 2012,” and “from August 6, 2012,” respectively, set forth in the first instance judgment as “from July 6, 2012” and “from August 2012, 2012.”

C. From Nos. 3 to 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Plaintiff “F” is the Plaintiff’s “F” to “F on March 26, 2014.”

Part 3, No. 14 of the first instance judgment states that "(based on recognition) No. 2-1 to 14, Gap evidence No. 10, Gap evidence No. 11, Gap evidence No. 12-1 through 5, Gap evidence No. 13-1 to 5, Gap evidence No. 14-1 to 5, Gap evidence No. 14-1 to 15, Gap evidence No. 16-1, 2-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings."

E. From Nos. 3 to 19 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following shall be followed.

“The Plaintiff paid the victim’s medical expenses to F. As such, the Defendant, the guardian of the aggressor student, is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the sum of KRW 11,380,40 (=5,886,00 + KRW 1,912,60 + KRW 2,891,800 + KRW 690 + KRW 9,310,400 calculated by deducting the individual treatment expenses for F from KRW 2,070 + KRW 11,380,400 + KRW 2,070,000) and delay damages therefor.”

(f) On the 4th written judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase “A evidence 2” in the 7th written judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to read “each description of A evidence 1 to 14”, and the phrase “witness” as “witness witness of the court of first instance”, respectively.

G. From No. 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance to No. 12 of the 13th sentence, the G Consultation Institute provided individual treatment to F, and the treatment cost of G Consultation Institute was 2,070,000 and the F of the G Consultation Institute’s 14th sentence to 15th sentence.