1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited or added as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

In the first instance judgment of 3 pages 1 to 2 of the first instance judgment, the following facts are written: “A 3, evidence Nos. 6 through 9, evidence Nos. 13, each entry in the evidence Nos. 1 and 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings” are written by the following: “No dispute exists,” Gap evidence Nos. 3, 5 through 11, evidence No. 13, evidence Nos. 13, and evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including the number of pages), and the purport of the whole pleadings.”

There are 3 pages 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "after use, from the defendant", "after use, received from the defendant".

In the judgment of the court of first instance, 5 pages 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance has no extenuating circumstance.

2) Following the phrase “A” argues that the Defendant used a significant portion of service costs for personal purposes and borrowed money from the Plaintiff in order to secure the personal use of the money from the Defendant. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that I used the money received from the Defendant as a personal use of the service costs, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by considering the overall purport of the pleadings in the statement No. 12, namely, there is no evidence to acknowledge that I used the money received from the Defendant as a personal use of the service costs. However, on November 22, 2016, the Dong Office of the Busan District Prosecutors’ Office reported that I had used most of the service costs received from the Defendant for the purpose of implementing the project.

In light of the fact that the defendant's above assertion is without merit in light of the fact that the defendant's non-prosecution disposition was rendered due to the lack of evidence.

"in addition".

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.