logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.12.07 2017나59932
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

On January 10, 2013, the first instance judgment 3 to 2-3, 201, “Plaintiff B, between Nonparty Company and Nonparty Company,” and “Plaintiff B, between Nonparty Company and Nonparty Company, on January 10, 2013.”

Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance provides that "total construction cost of KRW 218,350,00 (= KRW 19,850,000 plus tax of KRW 19,850,00)" shall be "total construction cost of KRW 218,350,000 (=additional tax of KRW 198,50,000 plus tax of KRW 19,850,000)."

In the first instance judgment, 10 pages 11 written "only to be supplied" shall be limited to "only to a person who is supplied".

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow