1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. According to the plaintiff's expansion of the purport of the claim in this court, the defendant shall be the plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is consistent with the reasoning of the court of first instance, except for further determination as set forth in the following 3 and 4, and thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance

2. On the 2nd page 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part which was used after the dismissal shall be subject to an “the head of the E headquarters (referring to the head of the E headquarters; hereinafter the same shall apply)”.

The judgment of the court of first instance in the third 3rd 3rd 3rd , "F" is "F." (hereinafter "F.").

6 pages 3 of the first instance court's decision, "A's evidence Nos. 2, 4, 7, and 2 and 3, the testimony of witness G" shall be written as "A's evidence Nos. 2, 4, 7, 14, Eul's evidence Nos. 2 and 3 (including the number of pages), and the testimony of witness G of the first instance court."

On the 3rd page 10 of the first instance judgment, the court below found that the above obligation for the construction cost against the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the defendant of the defendant of the defendant of the defendant of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the plaintiff of the

3. Judgment on the plaintiff's extended claim

A. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff claimed the Defendant to calculate the balance of the construction cost as KRW 9,60,152 [=172,80,000 for the construction cost of the new construction in the new fish farm - KRW 73,139,848 for the construction cost already paid (=2,889,848, which was paid at the value-added tax of KRW 45 million by the International Company J of KRW 15,250,00 for the construction cost of the new construction in the new fish farm - KRW 10,000 received from the Defendant for the payment of KRW 15,250,00 for the construction cost of the new construction in the new fish farm ].

However, among the amounts calculated by J as a result of the above-paid construction cost, the KJ guarantees the original obligation of the Plaintiff to pay ready-mixed to K (which is the supplier of ready-mixed used for the above construction).