beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On December 1, 2001, the Plaintiff was discharged from active service on March 31, 201, when he was discharged from active service on the part of the First Lieutenant.
B. On June 16, 2008, the Plaintiff: (a) on the part of the KFF CFFFF CFFFF, the executives and the public greged with others; (b) on the part of the KFFF CFF, the Plaintiff was injured by plucking, plucking and plucking the right kne; (c) on February 25, 2009, while conducting breging training on the right knee; (d) received a shock on the right knee; and (e) on the part of the application, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person of distinguished service to the Defendant on June 25, 2013.
C. On June 2008, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff on January 16, 201, that the Plaintiff did not constitute a person who rendered distinguished services to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation, on the ground that it is difficult to recognize that the injury was caused during the game due to the reason that there was a proximate causal relation with military duties or education and training, even if it was not verified that the Plaintiff was related to the performance of official duties, and that the injury was caused or aggravated.
On February 11, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an objection, but the Defendant notified the result of the review that it is dismissed on June 27, 2014. The Plaintiff again filed an application for re-registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State on March 2, 2015, but the Defendant notified the Plaintiff on August 27, 2015 that it does not meet the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”).
E. The Plaintiff appealed and filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission on November 25, 2015, but was dismissed on March 22, 2016.
[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry in Gap 8 and Eul 1 through 5 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The instant disposition is made.