logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.06.15 2017구단515
국가유공자요건비해당결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's primary claim and the conjunctive claim are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 27, 1975, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from office on December 28, 1977.

B. On June 10, 2004, the Plaintiff made an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that he was injured to both sides of knee in the course of training to the Defendant. The Plaintiff made a decision on August 4, 2005 that the Plaintiff does not constitute a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that there was no specific and objective evidence to verify the circumstances of injury, etc. on April 8, 2005, but the Plaintiff did not constitute a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that he did not constitute a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that he did not have any specific and objective evidence to verify the circumstances of injury, etc. on the ground that he was injured to the Defendant at the time of filing an application for reexamination by the Plaintiff, taking into account B’s letter of good faith, etc., which was his superior at the time of the Plaintiff’s further submission.

C. According to the above results of deliberation, the Defendant decided that the Plaintiff constitutes the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State, but the Plaintiff was determined to fall short of the criteria for rating as a result of physical examination on October 19, 2005.

On August 4, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that he or she was knee-de knee-deing and the right pansty fever (hereinafter “instant wounds”) with the Defendant during the shock training, and the Defendant on January 10, 2017, on the ground that “it is not recognized that the Plaintiff’s injury was caused by the direct cause of performance of duties or education and training directly related to the protection of the national defense and security, or the protection of the people’s lives and property, or that it is not recognized that the outbreak or the progress of education and training has deteriorated due to the cause of any performance of duties or education and training not directly related to the national defense and security, or the protection of the people’s lives and property,” the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State.

arrow