logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.03.31 2016구단6409
국가유공자 및 보훈보상대상자 비해당 결정처분 취소
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff entered the Army on August 20, 2005 and was assigned to the 47 management unit of the 103th Order of the 103th Order of the 103th Order of the 47th Order of the 195th Order of the 2005 Order of the 2005 Order of the 201st Order of the 201st Order of the 201st Order of the 201st Order of the 201st Order of the 201st Order of the 201st Order of the 201st Order of the 201st Order of the 201st Order of the 201st Order of the 201st Order of the 201st Order of the

around June 2, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant an application for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State, stating the following:

On January 12, 2015, the defendant did not recognize the requirements for the plaintiff to have rendered distinguished services to the State, but notified the person eligible for veteran's compensation (disaster injury) that the requirements were recognized and determined as persons eligible for the physical examination. Accordingly, the plaintiff received the physical examination.

Applicant After that, on May 26, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision on the Plaintiff’s non-conformity with a person eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that “the result of the physical examination fails to meet the criteria for disability rating prescribed by the statutes.”

(v) The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission dismissed the said request on November 17, 2015.

【Facts without dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidences 1 through 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. (i) The Plaintiff asserts that the instant disposition is legitimate, and that the Plaintiff sustained the instant wounds corresponding to Class 7 (No. 8122) of the disability rating at an athletic athletic event held in the military unit, and thus, he/she should be recognized as a person of distinguished service to the State who has rendered distinguished service to the State, or as a person eligible for veteran’s compensation

B. First of all, it is recognized as a health unit and a person of distinguished service to the State.

arrow