logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.09.01 2016고단1654
사기등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A has the duty of care to confirm the source, etc. of a mobile phone from a seller who is engaged in the business of selling a mobile phone with the trade name “E” at the office of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 301, and to check whether the mobile phone is stolen or not by checking the intention to sell the mobile phone against the seller.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around January 22, 2016, purchased only one cell phone in the amount of 965,800,000, which is equivalent to the market value of 165,800,000 won by stealing the name of G in the above office by stealing the above office by stealing the name of G, neglected such duty of care and neglected the judgment on the stolen goods, and acquired the stolen goods at KRW 630,00,00 from that time.

5. By the same method until 17.14, 14 mobile phone 13,609,90 won in total and acquired stolen goods by purchasing 8,685,000 won in the market price as shown in the attached list of crimes.

2. Defendant B, who is engaged in the sales of a mobile phone with the name “I” in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City H 1201, has the duty of care to verify the source, etc. of the mobile phone with the seller, and to verify whether the mobile phone is stolen or not by checking the intention to sell the mobile phone against the opening owner.

Nevertheless, around March 31, 2016, the Defendant purchased the four mobile phone units in the front of the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, by stealing the J name, in purchasing 3,561,800 won or more, such as gallon jus7, which is the sum of the market prices acquired by the F, thereby neglecting the above duty of care and acquiring the stolen 2,150,000 won by purchasing the four mobile phone units by negligence while neglecting the judgment on stolen goods.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect by the prosecution against the defendant A or F;

1. The investigation report (the Investigation Record No. 747 page);

arrow