logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.02.07 2017고단1770
도로교통법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 100,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving a rocketing taxi.

On February 18, 2017, the Defendant driven the above taxi on February 04:10, 2017, and proceeded at a US speed in the direction of the central hospital in the vicinity of the 528 U.S., Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, as the 528 U.S. Simsan-dong, and went to the U.S. university.

The location had a duty of care to make a left-hand turn turn according to the direction sign of the U.S. as a person engaged in driving on the long-distance at the intersection of the bank market.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and neglected the left-hand turn signal and violated the signal by making a U-turn on the opposite side to the red signal.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A penalty payment notification;

1. An explanatory note;

1. Violation photographs, field photographs (the defendant and his defense counsel claimed that the defendant's interned a 150-meter radius in front of the Saemaul credit cooperative, not the intersection of the bank market, but the 150-meter radius, and that the place is possible to be a red fluence, so the defendant does not violate the signal.

However, there are many experiences in controlling signal violations at the road of this case at the location of the road of this case, and the signal system of the private distance and the private distance is well-known to the intersection of the bank, and the penalty payment notification prepared after the detection of this case also clearly state the place of the violation as the "private distance in the bank market", and the control of this case was conducted by the above D due to mistake in light of the regulatory process and the place of control, etc.

In light of the fact that the Defendant did not have any specific objection at the time of the control of the instant case, the Defendant violated the signal, such as the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the Defendant.

The decision is judged.

Defendant

The assertion of counsel and counsel shall not be accepted) shall be applied to the law.

arrow