logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.07.11 2017고정855
도로교통법위반
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be 200,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives B rocketing car in his own possession as his duties.

On April 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 18:02, the 518 Student Education and Culture Center in front of the Seo-gu Special Metropolitan City Standing Democratic City, Seo-gu, Gwangju, is proceeding in the direction of the 518 Scam basin from the 518 Scamside to the 518 Scam basin; and (b) there is a place where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to make a internship at the point where the U.S. is permitted.

Nevertheless, there was a neglect in doing so, leading up to the central line.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. An explanatory note;

1. Control field map;

1. Application of statutes to a penalty payment notification;

1. Article 156 Subparag. 1 and Article 156 Subparag. 3 of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 14356, Dec. 2, 2016); the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is based on the following factors: (a) the sentencing conditions in the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, the background and result of the instant crime; and (b) the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the sentence is determined as ordered.

A favorable normal situation: The defendant has been divided into and reflected in his mistake.

It is necessary to punish the disadvantageous circumstances in light of the legislative intent of the Road Traffic Act to ensure traffic safety.

arrow