Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 60,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 30,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle B.

Around February 13:17, 2018, the Defendant was driving a road in front of the “et fywn,” which is located in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ayang-dong, with the said car, and the traffic safety facilities that are located therein, and signals and instructions accordingly are installed, and thus, a person engaging in driving a motor vehicle is required to drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the signal or instructions, but the person engaging in driving a motor vehicle was making a yellow fry, in violation of such signal or instructions.

As a result, the Defendant did not follow the signal indicating traffic safety facilities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;

1. A penalty payment notification, etc.;

1. Statement of control and photographs of the scene of detection;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Article 156 of the relevant Act and Articles 156 subparagraph 1 and 5 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s assertion as to the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be alleged to the effect that he/she did not violate the signal, since he/she himself/herself had a red-fluorial pattern.

However, according to the following circumstances which can be recognized by the evidence duly examined and adopted by this court, the above assertion is rejected, since the defendant can be found to have been sleeped in violation of the signal.

① At the time of the prosecutorial investigation, the Defendant thought that it is a non-protective left-hand turn, made a left-hand turn without using a signal, carried out a U-turn as it was turned to the NA, and did not confirm the color of the signal apparatus.

“The statement was made”.

(2) C, who is a control police officer, controlled the Defendant by making the U-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S

“.....”