beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won.
Defendant
B The above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A substantially operated (State) N for the purpose of acting as an agent call center brokerage and driving agency.
1. Defendant A
A. On May 2014, the Defendant would pay Q Q at the P office located on the third floor of the O building in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seongdong-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, for each 35,000 won per month for each 35,000 won mobile phone opening through the opening of the P office.
The phrase “” was false, and on the 21st of the same month, the victim SK Telecom S agency in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan R Building submitted an application for mobile phone membership to the victim SK Telecom S agency.
However, in fact, the Defendant was unable to pay 126,740,610 won for the use fee of the KS link service from around March 2014, and the Defendant was in arrears with approximately KRW 1,50,000,000 for the purchase price of the KS and the use price of the KS, and was in arrears with around October 2013, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the use fee even if the Defendant opened the mobile phone from the damaged person in the aggravated state of the finance, such as lending and changing the amount from those who around May 2014 for the above KS Telecom subscription.
Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) opened 3,306 LG beauty 2 mobile phones from May 21, 2014 to May 29, 2014; and (c) did not pay an amount equivalent to KRW 197,580,236 for mobile phone usage fees from August 7, 2014.
2) On June 15, 2014, the Defendant paid 35,000 won per month to an employee of the Victim SK Telecom U at the (ju) NN Office located on the sixth floor in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, from March 2014, the Defendant was unable to pay 126,740,610 won for the use fee of the KS link service, and around October 2013, while the Defendant was in arrears with approximately KRW 1,50,000,000 for the above SK Telecom subscription, the Defendant borrowed money from those who around May 2014 for the above SK Telecom subscription and changed its finance.