1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The appeal cost (including the cost resulting from the supplementary participation) shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

3...

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance except for dismissal or dismissal as set forth in the following (2).

2. On the 2nd part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant joining the defendant's wife of the plaintiff was found to be "the defendant joining the defendant who is the defendant's wife of the plaintiff" to be "the plaintiff's representative".

Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court, "Lease deposit received from the defendant" is deemed to be "Lease deposit received from the defendant".

From Nos. 3 to 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance, " shall be deemed to be sprinked," the following shall be applied:

"In this case, the plaintiff and the defendant, after completing the marriage report on September 30, 1981, have three children while living a married life. ② The plaintiff purchased the land in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City and the above land in his name on May 21, 1982 and purchased the status of reconstruction partner of the apartment in this case with the purchase price. After completion of reconstruction, the plaintiff completed the registration of preservation of ownership on June 13, 1994. ③ The plaintiff appears to have directly managed the apartment in this case on behalf of the plaintiff working at the local construction site, such as entering into a lease contract on the apartment in this case, and ④ The plaintiff did not legally leased the apartment in this case until the plaintiff 1 entered into the lease contract on his behalf.