1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning the instant case is as follows. The Plaintiff’s argument emphasized or added by this court is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the addition of “3. Additional Judgment” as to the assertion that the Plaintiff emphasizes or added in this court. As such, this is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, “A person from around December 2, 2013 is a person who has been laid down or dried,” the part of which was laid down as follows:

From June 22, 2012, from Kimpo-si to Kimpo-si, business registration was made with the trade name of C gas station (hereinafter “instant gas station”) in Kimpo-si B, and the gas station was operated on November 13, 2013 (F and joint business operators registered on November 13, 2013). In the first instance judgment, “designated and was discovered, and was discovered.”

Nos. 24 and 25 of the judgment of the first instance shall be followed as follows.

E. Around July 2, 2015, the Plaintiff recovered facilities provided without compensation to the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant purchased and sold petroleum products from another oil company. After that, the Defendant transferred the gas station business of this case to G on July 14, 2015, the Plaintiff changed the “each entry of No. 1, No. 2, No. 7-1, and No. 2” of No. 4 of the first instance judgment to “No. 1, No. 2, No. 7-2.”

Part 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance from Nos. 13 to 19 of the judgment of the court of first instance "(2) that the defendant does not seem to have a large portion by the plaintiff is written as follows.

② For about three years and six months, the Defendant continued to be supplied with petroleum products at the gas station in this case while maintaining the Plaintiff’s spool in the gas station in this case. Accordingly, the Plaintiff acquired a lot of economic benefits by advertising through spool and supplying petroleum products continuously during the above period. ③ The Plaintiff purchased the entire amount since the Defendant entered into the supply contract in this case.