(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.10.15 2020나2004636

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.10.15 2020나2004636

손해배상(건)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants is modified as follows. A.

The Plaintiff, Defendant 1, Inc.

Reasons

The reasoning for this Court’s explanation concerning this part is as follows: (a) the part of “1. Basic Facts” to Chapter 3 is the same as the part of “1. Basic Facts” to Part 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the cases of writing or adding some parts as follows: (b) 3 through 8 of the first instance judgment.

(Attachment 1, 2, 4). [Attachment 1, 2, and 4] [Attachment 3 to the judgment of the court of first instance] shall be written in attached Form 3 of this judgment.

Defendant E, Co., Ltd., Ltd., in the fifth page of the judgment of the first instance, shall be incorporated into “Co-Defendant E, Ltd. of the first instance trial.”

The general aggregate table of repair costs shall be applied from the bottom of the sixthth judgment to the top of the seventh grade as follows:

As for the changes of the previous construction for the first five-year four-year-4 preceding the previous four-year-107, 91, 946, 070, 363, 476 26, 221, 962, 245, 69-3, 379, 374, 1862, 180, 1864, 1862, 184, 369, 197, 197, 197, 1964, 197, 1963, 197, 197, 1964, 197, 197, 1963, 186, 196, 196, 194, 196, 196, 197, 196, 197, 2537, 197, 197, 1965

【. The Plaintiff and the Defendant’s Intervenor, on May 16, 2013, entered into an agreement on the completion of repairs of defects (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

A. The Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”) is called the termination agreement.

(3) Article 1 (Completion of Repairs of Defects in Three Years) The content of the agreement between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “agreement”) is as mutually agreed.

As to the Plaintiff and the Intervenor’s Intervenor, the Plaintiff and the Intervenor are faithfully performing. Moreover, with respect to the part of the non-execution prior to the completion of the construction, the separate 4 alternative construction agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2020.06.24 2019나2015715

-서울고등법원 2020.07.23 2019나2036613

-서울고등법원 2020.02.07 2019나2017124

-부산고등법원 2017.12.21 2017나25